| —> |
Forum Topic about this ship |
| JaM: |
It is a nice building sweeper for those who don't have the penguin.
|
| Dutchbatter: |
I think this is a good ship.
|
| panzerfaust: |
i think its a sort of replica of the warcruiser, but it suits fine if you ask me. But if it gets hit by a fighter, will it lose 100 points+1point of the actual effect of the fighter? Plus there should stand why it loses 100 points. I was thinking of this: because of the vulnerable shielding of the ship, the power generatot can be disturbed and easily damaged vital parts of the ship.
|
| panzerfaust: |
Sorry for the spelling mistakes: generatot should be generator, and damaged should be damage.
|
| spacetrace: |
that sounds cool . |
| JaM: |
maybe it could replace the warcruiser
|
| Dutchbatter: |
There you have a point jam, i think it is a good idea to replace it for the war cruiser.
|
| spacetrace: |
sounds cool to me
|
| kamekaze6: |
what happens if it meets 2 fighters LOL. is the only advantage in it s attack
|
| spacetrace: |
i place it on a planet .
--------------------------
it is a cool replacement for the warcruiser. |
| blackmagic: |
I think it would be good for a planet but not an actual ship becuase i feel this ship can be too vunerable. 2 fighter? Wat about 2 missle launchers? I mean come on. Sure i think its an actual good invention in a long time, but i don't think many people would use this ship to so much of an extent to be useful |
| doomstar: |
Agree with Blackmagic. Just the thought alone of encoutering an enemy with a couple of class 3 and you might lose your entire fleet, assuming that your class 3 only consist of Heavy Cruiser.
:grin: :grin: :grin: :grin: |
| blackmagic: |
yup yup !!! :grin: :grin: |
| steven1982: |
Good ship!
|
| darklim: |
"
On 2004-05-25 07:09, doomstar wrote:
Agree with Blackmagic. Just the thought alone of encoutering an enemy with a couple of class 3 and you might lose your entire fleet, assuming that your class 3 only consist of Heavy Cruiser.
:grin: :grin: :grin: :grin:
"
Some Troikas, Graze Reactors or just Fighters can destroy it
|
| BladeTech: |
but thatz what balances it out. i like the idea but i don't think it should replace the war-cruiser. |
| doomstar: |
Agree with replacing the Warcruiser. I regret the time I spent researching that ship.
:grin: :grin: :grin: :grin: |
| BladeTech: |
how come? i mean that would make the torpedo interceptions of some of the ships useless and thereby kinda hurt the usefullness of the disable ship |
| blackmagic: |
Yeah i agree with Blade. The warcruiser is a pretty neat invention evention though i don't use it myself. I rather stick to attacking people, not buildings.
I figure that this ship is just odd in some way. Say all you need to carry in 1 missle launcher just to catch a heavy cruiser. I suppose the ship is more like a trade off. I hit you and then you hit me and i die. its like the regular cruiser, but the only thing different is that it has 200ap and it can be killed with 2 lower class ships. Wats up with that? I don't think this ship would be used much as the Warcuiser. I say Ditch the heavy cruiser and keep the warcruiser. I fell the warcruiser is much more stable to use.
It would be alright it the ship stays on a planet, but nothing else. :)26
That is my Thoughts =)
Blackmagic of Shadowball
-Major Critic (LOL)
|
| BladeTech: |
yea...this cruiser could complement the warcruiser b/c the warcruiser does have its disadvantages, but this ship shouldn't just replace it. |
| blackmagic: |
@Blade- Must you repeat everything i say? LOL It seems like eveytime i post a explaination, you always post right after it saying basically the same thing or agreeing with it. Ya know, you could give you own arguement instead of tring to get more posts than the admins :grin:
|
| BladeTech: |
actually YOU posted after most of mine first. besides, i sed what i sed first not from you. lol. and i'm saying it could be added to the game not that it can't.
|
human-Technology